← Geometry of the Good

How to cite

There are two distinct objects to cite when referencing this work: the book itself, and the formal ontology rendered here. Depending on what your work draws on, you may cite one or both.

Citing the book

If your work engages the philosophical argument of The Geometry of the Good — its claims about obligation, directedness, recognition, fidelity, rupture — cite the book directly.

Chicago

In a footnote or endnote

David R. Koepsell, The Geometry of the Good: The Architecture of Social Being, Book 1 (2025).

MLA

In a works cited list

Koepsell, David R. The Geometry of the Good: The Architecture of Social Being, Book 1. 2025.

APA

In a reference list

Koepsell, D. R. (2025). The Geometry of the Good: The Architecture of Social Being, Book 1.

Citing the ontology artifact

If your work engages this formal rendering — drawing on specific OWL class commitments, citing the BFO mapping of particular concepts, or building derivative artifacts from this ontology — cite the artifact separately.

Chicago

In a footnote or endnote

David R. Koepsell, The Geometry of the Good: A BFO-Aligned Formal Ontology, version 1.0 (Zenodo, May 20, 2026), https://doi.org/.

BibTeX

For LaTeX bibliographies

@misc{koepsell_gog_ontology,
  author    = {Koepsell, David R.},
  title     = {The Geometry of the Good:
               A BFO-Aligned Formal Ontology},
  year      = {2026},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  version   = {1.0},
  doi       = {},
  url       = {https://doi.org/},
  note      = {Formal rendering of the framework developed in
               Koepsell, The Geometry of the Good (2025).
               BFO-aligned, consistency-validated by HermiT}
}

@book{koepsell_gog_book,
  author    = {Koepsell, David R.},
  title     = {The Geometry of the Good: The Architecture
               of Social Being, Book 1},
  year      = {2025}
}

What you should cite separately

The ontology depends on tools and frameworks that have their own citations.

The Basic Formal Ontology

Arp, R., Smith, B., and Spear, A. D. (2015). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

The HermiT reasoner

Glimm, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Stoilos, G., and Wang, Z. (2014). HermiT: An OWL 2 reasoner. Journal of Automated Reasoning 53(3), 245–269.

BFO-Agent

Koepsell, D. R. (2026). BFO-Agent: A dialogue architecture for ontology extraction with reasoner-validated commitments. (forthcoming.)

Companion artifacts

Other BFO-aligned ontologies by the same author are available and may be cited in parallel where comparison work is involved.

The Spinoza ontology at spinoza.davidkoepsell.com — formal rendering of Spinoza's Ethics, extracted via BFO-Agent's dialogue pipeline with full per-class provenance.

The Leibniz ontology at leibniz.davidkoepsell.com — formal rendering of Duncan's anthology of Leibniz's philosophical works, with degraded per-class provenance disclosed in its methodology page.

Versioning

The ontology is versioned by the SemVer convention. The current version is 1.0, reflecting the state of the ontology at the book's publication. Future revisions will increment the version and receive new DOIs at Zenodo. Cite the version that matches the artifact you actually engaged with.